Comments on: Baby Blanket

By: prolifeinternational

prolifeinternational — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

“and dangerous” How?
“and dangerous” How?

By: mtstates3day

mtstates3day — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

Amendment 48 was …
Amendment 48 was not about elective abortion. It was about redefining a “person”. It was overreaching, poorly thought out, and dangerous. You lost, get over it.

By: prolifeinternational

prolifeinternational — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

“A fertilized egg …
“A fertilized egg is 2 cells.” Yes,but most deliberate abortions take place either in the late embryonic stage,or the fetal stage at 8 weeks onwards. Re “Until it can live separately,the life and health of the mother MUST take precedence.” The life and health of the mother should talk precedence but ONLY IF it is seriously threatened by continuing the pregnancy e.g. with ectopic,when BOTH mother AND baby will very likely die..

By: innocnceuntouched

innocnceuntouched — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

I agree, this is …
I agree, this is truly brilliant!!

By: CaMediaRC

CaMediaRC — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

That doesn’t prove …
That doesn’t prove the absence of a human life in the womb. The unborn has its own DNA, which will be with him/her for their entire life. So I believe the unborn is a human person (beating heart) (unique DNA), while you believe he/she is not living because they aren’t breathing on their own. We can’t prove to each other the truth of our own arguments. So again, why risk it?

By: mtstates3day

mtstates3day — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

You miss the whole …
You miss the whole point. The example involving the baby blanket presumes the presence of a baby – a living, breathing entity. A fertilized eg is 2 cells. It has NO chance of survival outside the womb. Until it can live separately, the life and health of the mother MUST take precedence. The survival of the actual must always supercede the survival of the potential!

By: grainsofhope

grainsofhope — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

Terrific!!!
Terrific!!!

By: 07viper

07viper — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

Right on bro
Right on bro

By: prolifeinternational

prolifeinternational — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:10 +0000

BRILLIANT!
BRILLIANT!

By: prolifeinternational

prolifeinternational — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:09 +0000

“but you have no …
“but you have no business endangering other people’s lives as a result of your opinions.” I agree,that is why I think that(until medical science can rectify the problem) ectopic pregnancy is one of the few essential exceptions to a law banning abortion.

By: mtstates3day

mtstates3day — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:29:09 +0000

Someone with an …
Someone with an ectopic pregnancy would be precluded from necessary surgery (to prevent death from internal bleeding) until a court determined that the “person” she carried had died of natural causes. Even then, there were potential ramifications to the woman regarding criminal charges due to the untimely death of the embryo. If you disagree with abortions for any reason, don’t have one, but you have no business endangering other people’s lives as a result of your opinions.